anyone here hate the government taking away all our rights and turning us into slaves, would a Timothy Mcveigh style attack on all the government buildings be justice? why or why not?
When the Government goes dicktatershit on everyone, whos gonna stop it?
Related Post
Tags: blows, buildings, Consider, Government, Hero, person, Someone, Washington, Would
Is this Bethy? Primo? Who is this? Ha!
Bill Ayers blew up alot of government buildings. He’s the liberal darling professor now.
No. I would consider them a terrorist
Ask some of Obama’s buddies. They have experience in this field EG: Bill Ayers
Obama launched his political career in the living room of people who did this type of terrorism back in the 70s. (Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers)
PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN!
On the one hand it would increase the standard of living in America over the long term if the government was not able to sell large amounts of bonds and print money to finance a debt. On the other hand it would probably kill a few people. I would rather have Washington be defeated through logic than violence.
That all depends. If the government suspends the constitution and becomes a dictatorship. Not while we are having free elections and the President leaves office at the end of his term.
No person who kills innocent people is a hero.
Hell, you’re a bad person just for implying that such a person is potentially capable of being a hero.
gongoria, you gotta be a nut job, yourself.
only to the liberals. i would consider them criminals and charge them with pre meditated murder.
there are better ways to handle descent.
look, violence is pretty much always wrong. McVeigh killed kids, and there is no excusing that. Government has surely overstepped its bounds, but violence would me immoral and ineffective. What do you think would happen if someone started bombing buildings in DC? I assure you that the reaction wouldn’t lead us to a freer society, but rather closer to a police state.
What did the buildings do to hurt anyone. Bad policies are the result of inept and/or corrupt people the buildings simply give them a place to work within. Yea, I know arguably only modern buildings ought to exist and Ann Rand Architectural purists would argue that there is no value in any of the buildings in Washington DC but personally I like old buildings. I think the US Capitol is one heck of a building comparable to the Taj Mahal in beauty.
Here is a thought – - – if you don’t like the US Congress you could always turn the building into a mosque. It already has a cool dome, just ad a pair of minarets/towers for a fair and balanced view.
Though flawed the White House is pretty neat so once again I argue, the buildings should be spared just drag out the soulless rats within.
Peace///////////\\\\\\\\
Hate to disappoint you, love, but I don’t report heroes.
Cheerio.
This is the tactic we are attempting to use against the Taliban. “Violence [against the government] never solves anything.” If you get rid of some of the bad people in the government, other bad people will come in and replace them.
Bad people end up leading us in the first place because voters make bad decisions. Even if you managed to wipe out the entire government and military, their replacements would be just as bad because voters would use the same ridiculous logic when electing them. We as the citizens of the United States need to figure out what it is we want, then find people who will make our wishes into law and enforce those laws. Our current system of letting the people we’re getting rid of choose our options for who will replace them, picking the least worst option of the ones we’re given, then hoping for the best once they get into office is not working very well for obvious reasons.