Timothy McVeigh was right to be angry over what happened at Ruby Ridge and Waco? I don’t think it gave him the right to do what he did in OKC in 1995, but was he right to be angry over these two incidents?
Related Post
Tags: Aside, Feel, from, later
This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 29th, 2011 at 12:32 pm and is filed under News.
You can follow any comments to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a comment, or trackback from your own site.
I think that if you had a job that needed to be done, McVeigh would have been the man to do it. He spent months planning and practicing and his execution was almost flawless. No, what he did was NOT right.
He was right to be angry.
He was not right to blow up anyone or anything.
A lot of people including me was upset about the Clinton tyranny during this time and Janet Reno and her over control. This is not how we as a people handle this.
We always have and will vote out the usurpers and get them out of power just like we will in 2012.
Ruby Ridge was just a family that wanted to be left alone, Waco was a bunch of wackos.
At waco?
No.
He was right to be angry but his anger was misdirected towards innocent people.
Not really.
He was just as wacko as the ones at Waco.
absolutely, at ruby ridge a man was lured by government officials into committing a crime,they raided his home shot his sons dog than shot his son, an fbi sniper shot his unarmed wife in the head as she held her baby in her arms,……….at waco, they could have arrested koresh when he left the compound as he did frequently, but that would have been no fun when you could go in guns blazing, shooting blindly into a house you know is full of women and children, whether the government set the fire with their teargas cannisters or live fire hitting fuel reserves or self ignited killing dozens of children,we may never know, but the amount of corruption from just these two known incidents was enough to push him over the edge into an insanity all his own
You really need to get out of the house a bit.